The Freedom To Marry: Rites & Rights logo  

Search lmaw.org on Google


Table Of Contents Index

Table Of Contents

US Supreme Court building

Part I – Background

Welcome and introduction

What will you find here?

The Reading Room

What you won’t find here

About the author

What year…?

What is marriage?

Marriage, not “gay marriage”

What do we mean by marriage?

What do we mean by legal marriage?

Laws associated with legal marriage

Baker marriage license

Part II – History

1942: Skinner v. Oklahoma

Marriage is “one of the basic civil rights”

1948: Perez v. Sharp

The person of one’s choice

1967: Loving v. Virginia

One of the vital personal rights

1969-1970: Stonewall, and same-sex couples

1971: The first same-sex couple to be legally married: Baker and McConnell

Baker v. Nelson

1972-1973: ERA (the Equal Rights Amendment) and DOMA

1974: Singer v. Hara

1975: More licenses

Immigration

1976-1978: Zablocki v. Redhail

The right to marry is fundamental and protected by the 14th Amendment

1984-1987: Turner v. Safley

Even prisoners have a right to marry

1990: The start of the modern era

Well, since “deadbeat dads” and even prisoners have the right to marry…

1993: Baehr v. Lewin – “marriage is a basic civil right”

Equal protection analysis

A suspect category…

…and a fundamental right.

But isn’t it fair to say that everyone has to marry the opposite sex?

The case gets sent back to the lower court

1994-1995: Utah’s DOMA

1996: Romer v. Evans, and DOMAs

Denying fundamental rights to a class of citizens is unconstitutional

DOMAs

December 1996: Baehr wins again

1997-1998: Brause & Dugan v. State Of Alaska

One’s choice of a life partner is a fundamental right

1998-1999: Constitutional amendments

1999: Baker v. State Of Vermont – a study in contradiction

A constitutional obligation…

…but marriage is not one of the benefits and protections of marriage

2000-2001: Civil unions

More constitutional amendments and their fallout

2001-2002: “Civil union”? What’s that?

May 2003: Nebraska’s amendment is challenged

June 2003: Lawrence v. Texas

Foreign marriages and portability

Privacy is more important than tradition

June 2003: Scalia gets it partly right

November 2003: Goodridge v. Department Of Public Health

December 2003: The Governor’s reaction to Goodridge

December 2003: Civil unions are unfair and unconstitutional

January 2004: Bush wants to amend the Constitution

February 2004: San Francisco

March/April 2004: The marriages spread, along with lawsuits

May 2004: Marriage in Massachusetts and the Cherokee Nation

Massachusetts

The Cherokee Nation

Summer 2004: Highs and lows

Same-sex couples have the right to marry…

…while 4,000 married couples are forcibly divorced…

…and setbacks happen in two other states

September 2004: Castle v. State Of Washington

November 2004 to January 2005: A cold hard winter

Amendments and the Supreme Court

Procreate responsibly

February/March 2005: Spring thaw

New York

Washington State

California

April to June 2005: You win some, but you mostly lose some

More forcible divorces, amendments, and DOMAs…

…but you can’t keep same-sex couples from having any rights.

You can, however, use religion to keep them from the right to marry (in New Jersey, anyway)…

…and (in California), fundamental civil rights aren’t really for everyone.

Fall 2005: Could be worse. Could be raining.

California

Texas

New York

Iowa

Winter 2006: Progress

Maryland

Summer 2006: Disappointment

New York

Washington State

Connecticut

Nebraska/federal

Alabama

Fall 2006: Is this progress?

Rhode Island couples get to marry – in Massachusetts

California couples get no help from the intermediate court…

…while New Jersey couples get civil unions

And seven states amend their constitutions – while one votes against it

The Supreme Court stays out of it

But South Africa does the right thing

2007: Comity

March: Foreign marriages are recognized in New York

May: Some Massachusetts marriages can also be recognized in New York

June: The proposed amendment fails in Massachusetts

July: As far as Massachusetts is concerned, New Mexico couples can marry in Massachusetts

2007: Varnum v. Brien

Iowa couples get the right to marry – briefly

2007: Maryland’s court disappoints in Deane & Polyak

Good news: New York State

Good news: Seattle

Good news: California (again)

Bad news: Maryland, California, and Rhode Island

2008

Good news: New York State

protesting for marriage, in New York

Part III – Summary and conclusion

Summary: 1942-1989

Summary: 1990-2001

Summary: 2001-2004

Summary: 2004-2005

Summary: 2005-2006

Summary: 2007-2008

Conclusion

We’ve seen that…

Looking ahead…

wedding cake

Cake

Part IV – Useful stuff

The Reading Room

Resources

These organizations are a great way to get involved and stay informed.

These resources provide excellent ways to stay informed.

Index

The Freedom To Marry: Rites & Rights logo updated 2 Mar 2008
The text and timeline graphics are copyright Ken Molsberry, 2005-2008. Do not reuse or quote without permission.
Case decisions and other government documents are public record and may be used freely.
Copyrights for all other images/documents reside with their creator.
Resting your cursor on an image shows the source where known.

Table Of Contents Index